| |
| Tech Talk is a feature from the old KMFDM website which we have resurrected due to numerous requests. Here you will find a question asked by a fan and the answer by a member of KMFDM. We will update with new questions and answers from time to time. If you would like to ask a Tech Talk question please email it to techtalk@kmfdm.net. To be chosen your question must include your name and the question must relate to the technical process of writing and recording music. | |
|
Answer (Sascha):The vocals are recorded once there is some semblance of an arrangement of a new song. Often, while we record the vocals new ideas come up that will then force the track to be re-arranged. The distortion varies, but more often than not I use the Ampfarm plug-in. It’s by far the best sounding smooth distortion available. Another way I do it, is to re-amp the vocals and record them onto a cassette tape, with Dolby noise reduction on. Then I play back the tape with Dolby noise reduction off and re-record it into Pro Tools. Various degrees of realy nice sounding distortion can be achieved that way.
Answer (Jules):As I wasn't arround at the time "Brute" was recorded I can't tell you what was used in the studio. However, if you're looking for something to play through that could produce similar sounds on a budget, I just tried a SansAmp GT2 tube emulation pedal and it sounded really good. You could plug that straight into the inputs of your hi-fi. Other than that, some of the smaller Marshall practice amps sound great. It is a little known fact, but many "big" sounding guitar tracks don't come from walls of high powered amps and loads of expensive mics, but from a practice amp and 1 mic!
Answer (Jules):At the moment I run a Marshall JMP 1 preamp going into the power amp section of a Peavey 5150 head through a Mesa Boogie 4 x 12 cab. Most of my effects come from a Rocktron Replifex inserted into the effects loop of the JMP 1. My pedal board consists of a DOD passive A/B box, one output of which goes to a Korg tuner, the other to the rest of my pedals - a Jim Dunlop Crybaby wah, a Digitech Whammy II and a Boss noise surpressor. I also have a Rolls midi buddy floor board to change patches on the Rocktron and JMP 1, however I rarely use it as I run program change messages to preamp and effects processor from the Pro Tools rig we have onstage, eliminating 90% of the "tap dancing".
Answer (Sascha):It is all put together in Pro Tools, which acts basically like a huge complex tapemachine. I place the elements where I want them to go and build the song that way.
Answer (Sascha):That is correct, I used my Sequential Pro-1 for it, the internal sequencer is sweeeet!
Answer (Jules Hodgson):As far as guitars go, there's no limit to the processing we sometimes apply to them. As our sound is very layered with a lot of stereo panning synths and samples, it very often applies that less is more as far as guitar processing. If you get too crazy with effects and you stand a good chance of losing what you're playing in the mix.Most "rhythm" guitar parts (riffs, etc.) tend to be double-tracked, i.e., played identically twice and panned hard left and right with little processing (maybe eq, sometimes a slow chorusing effect or a little delay). However, there's plenty of odd bits of super-processed guitar (and bass) stuff in many of our songs too. Sometimes it is pretty difficult to spot as they don't end up sounding like you'd expect. Most of the effect stuff happens after tracking the part, but whilst monitoring the effects as we're laying the tracks down, usualy using plug-ins in Pro Tools. Hope this is helpful to ya!
Answer (Jules Hodgson):Sascha has a couple of Avalon mic pres and I use a Truevoice Precision 8 along with some pres off a Mackie desk. Most guitars are tracked through the Truevoice at my studio and occasionally through the Avalons. The Mackie only comes into the equation for extra inputs when recording drums.Most guitar parts are played direct into Pro Tools and given their sounds using Amp Farm, SansAmp, AmpliTube or Isotope Trash (usualy Amp Farm). If I'm recording cabinets, a well placed Sure SM57 gets good results. Sometimes I'll try a Neuman on another speaker as well, but making the decision as to when both mics are sounding good phase-wise can be more hastle than it's worth.
Answer (Jules Hodgson):It is indeed in open C. Tuning from low to high pitch is: C, G, C, C, G, C. It was recorded on a Yamaha acoustic I picked up in a junk store. The soundboard had come away from the body resulting in such a high action it could only be used for slide. I payed $15 for it. A few months later it got destroyed at a drunken party! Typical !!!
Question (Chris J.):What was the best piece of equipment KMFDM thought was going to change it all? Did it live up to expectations? What made it so good/bad?
Question (Anita T.):KMFDM is kind of known for having orchestral / symphonic parts in some songs. Do you sample those or do you write them and what is the resulting difference?
The sampling mentality of DIY seems to me to dictate the rest of the song, in that, once the orchestra samples had all been found, jiggled around until something worked, the rest of the track could form round that and the bass line, whereas the strings in Blackball were written specifically to modulate and get from one place to the next musically. I know that if I'd have started trying to put together a part like DIY, I would have got nowhere, because I wouldn't have the tenacity to get it to a point where I'd have the starting blocks of a song, whereas in "Blackball", because of all the classical training bullshit I had as a nipper, I could write a specific part, knowing the voicings of a string section to work as an atmospheric link between one part and another. All I'm really saying here is that myself and Sascha have very different ways of getting results, both of which are equally as valid and, to my way of thinking compliment each other really well. It's a pretty good situation to be in - I write something, and Sascha fucks with it and gives it all the nitty-gritty twists it needs, and he gives something to me to work on, and I throw in the guitars and "musical" bits to make it glue, and then there's Andy... I'm used to recording "whole drum takes" rather than putting together beats from loops and samples, so when we bring Andy into the equation, we end up with really tight punchy drum takes AND all the insane beat bashing that Sascha's warped head comes up with. Now that's what I call "Ultra Heavy Beat"!!! One way in which I combine both approaches is with some drum parts: If I want a specific sounding drum loop, rather than sift through a whole pile of sample CDs and sound bites, I just explain the beat to Andy, get him to tune the drums to the sound I want, record it, then fuck with it till it's exactly right. You can hear that in "From Here on Out" from WWIII. Sascha came up with the initial groove and bassline and I figured it needed beefing up with some real kit stuff The main drum part is a 4 bar loop played with no cymbals so I could get that boxy compressed room sound, then Andy played all the fills in after we'd got our loop and sound, then we overdubbed all the cymbal hits. This gives the track that repetitive "sample loop" sound but with all the flavour that a live drummer adds. I guess all I'm saying here is that there's no one way to do things, and I've certainly learned a lot about fucked-up sampling from Ze Father...And what worldly wisdom have I managed to leave with him? Not to handcuff me to a bar unless he's prepared to pick up the tab the next day. Ha Ha!!! Submit your questions for KMFDM's Tech Talk at techtalk@kmfdm.net |